Any Person, Other Than Acquirer, Can Announce Open Offer Within 15 Days of Acquirer’s Detailed Public Statement | SC
- Blog|News|Company Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 3 March, 2025
Case Details: Digvijay Laxhamsinh Gaekwad (Danny Gaekwad) v. Sapna Govind Rao - [2025] 171 taxmann.com 676 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Sanjiv Khanna, CJI & Sanjay Kumar, J.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, private respondents had made a competing offer on 3-10-2023 and the appellant had made public announcement on 18-1-2025. The appellant’s application before SEBI on 22-1-2025 was within time period, as prescribed by Regulation 20 of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011.
However, respondents had claimed that the public offer date should be taken as 3-10-2023, making the appellant’s application belated and beyond time and, SEBI had yet to decide the said aspect.
It was noted that there had been several attempts to stall public offer without success. However, it was also considered that an application filed by the appellants was still pending before SEBI and had not yet been disposed.
Further, it was noted that the appellant was required to deposit a sum of Rs. 600 crores in terms of Regulations, in the form of cash and/or bank guarantee, before 12-2-2025. The public offer price should be higher of the two – acquisition price or market price prevailing at the time of public offer.
Supreme Court Held
The Supreme Court observed that upon public announcement of an open offer for acquisition of shares of target company being made, any person, other than acquirer who has made such public announcement, must be entitled to make a public announcement of an open offer within fifteen working days of date of detailed public statement made by acquirer who has made first public announcement.
The Supreme Court held that upon the public announcement of a competing offer, an acquirer who had made a preceding competing offer must be entitled to revise terms of his open offer provided the revised terms are more favourable to shareholders of the target company.
Further, the Supreme Court held that acquirers making competing offers must be entitled to make upward revisions of offer price at any time up to one working day prior to commencement of tendering period.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied