[Analysis] IBBI Proposes Mediation for Operational Creditors under IBC to Streamline Dispute Resolution
- Blog|Advisory|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 8 November, 2024
Mediation for operational creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is a proposed dispute resolution process that allows operational creditors to attempt settlement with corporate debtors before filing for insolvency under Section 9. This initiative, introduced by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), aims to resolve disputes related to payment defaults, quality of goods, and contractual issues through a mediator rather than directly proceeding to court. If mediation is unsuccessful, a non-settlement report is attached to the application, simplifying the adjudication process. This approach reduces judicial caseload, enhances efficiency, and offers a cost-effective resolution path for operational creditors.
Table of Contents
- Problem Statement & Challenges in Section 9 Applications
- Proposal for Mediation
- Impact
- Invitation for Public Comments
On November 4, 2024, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) published a discussion paper that puts forward a proposal for introducing mediation as an initial step for operational creditors (OCs) before they file an insolvency application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). This proposal aligns with the Expert Committee’s recommendations on the ‘Framework for the use of Mediation under the IBC’ and the Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI (IIIPI). Both bodies have advocated for a pre-institutional mediation step to resolve disputes early on.
1. Problem Statement & Challenges in Section 9 Applications
Applications under Section 9 often face consistent challenges, predominantly stemming from conflicts between OCs and Corporate Debtors (CDs) over issues such as:
- Disputes related to the quality or performance of goods and services delivered.
- Contractual disputes are allegations of non-compliance with the terms agreed upon by either party.
- Disagreements over the amounts due, including set-off claims.
Such disputes frequently lead to protracted legal proceedings and place an undue burden on the judicial system. Data from the Adjudicating Authority (AA) up to April 2024 reveals that out of 21,466 Section 9 applications, only 3,818 were admitted, reflecting a high rate of pre-admission settlements. Moreover, the AA is mandated to conduct hearings before deciding on an application, a process that is often lengthy. Mediation is proposed as a beneficial tool to alleviate these disputes between OCs and corporate debtors early on and facilitate quicker admissions by the AA.
2. Proposal for Mediation
In response to these ongoing issues, the IBBI proposes an optional mediation process that OCs might choose to engage in before proceeding with insolvency applications. Under this proposed system, a mediator would conduct mediation as per the Mediation Act, 2023. This could enable parties to address and potentially resolve their disputes without overburdening the AA. If mediation does not result in a settlement, the mediator would issue a non-settlement report, which would then accompany the OC’s application to the AA, thereby streamlining the admission process.
3. Impact
The proposed mediation framework for operational creditors before filing Section 9 insolvency applications is poised to improve the dispute resolution mechanism under the IBC significantly. By facilitating early mediation, the initiative is designed to reduce the caseload on the Adjudicating Authority, expedite resolutions, and enhance judicial resource efficiency. The proactive mediation approach is expected to bolster settlement rates, simplify the application process, and offer a more cost-effective method for dispute resolution.
4. Invitation for Public Comments
To further refine this mediation framework, the IBBI invites public feedback on the proposed mediation process and the associated draft regulations. Comments are requested to be submitted by November 24, 2024. After considering the public input, the IBBI plans to finalize and implement the regulations governing this mediation process. This initiative seeks to provide a quicker and more economical means for resolving disputes, thereby reducing the judicial burden and speeding up the insolvency resolution process for operational creditors.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied