[Analysis] Compliance for Non-Convertible Securities (NCS) – Key Proposals by SEBI

  • Blog|Advisory|Company Law|
  • 5 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 27 August, 2024

Non-Convertible Securities; NCS

Non-convertible Securities (NCS) are financial instruments, typically debt instruments like bonds or debentures, that cannot be converted into equity shares of the issuing company. They offer fixed returns in the form of interest or dividends over a specified period. NCS are primarily used by companies to raise capital while keeping ownership and control intact since investors do not have the option to convert these securities into equity. They are a popular choice among investors seeking stable returns without the equity-related risks associated with stock investments.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Rationale Behind the Proposals
  3. SEBI’s Key Proposals for Non-Convertible Securities
  4. Conclusion

1. Introduction

On August 16, 2024, SEBI unveiled a Consultation Paper focused on enhancing the ease of doing business and streamlining compliance requirements for Non-Convertible Securities (NCS). This initiative is a part of SEBI’s ongoing efforts to align the regulatory framework for non-convertible securities with that of equity-listed entities, aiming to simplify procedures, reduce administrative burdens and promote greater efficiency in financial market operations. The key proposals include aligning the provisions for approval and authentication of financial results, standardising fraud and default disclosure requirements, reducing the timeline for record date intimations, mandating the use of the XBRL format for filings and providing flexibility concerning ISIN restrictions for certain securities. Comments may be submitted by September 6, 2024.

Taxmann.com | Research | Company & SEBI Laws

2. Rationale Behind the Proposals

In the budget announcements for FY 2023-24, the Hon’ble Finance Minister emphasised simplifying, easing and reducing the cost of compliance for participants in the financial sector through a consultative approach. In order to align the process of review with the budget announcement, SEBI established several Working Groups to propose measures for simplifying and easing compliance under various SEBI Regulations.

Accordingly, a Working Group for reviewing compliance requirements under the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, recommended certain measures to promote the ease of doing business for entities with listed non-convertible securities. The key proposals are detailed below:

3. SEBI’s Key Proposals for Non-Convertible Securities

3.1 Alignment of provisions regarding approval and authentication of financial results for equity and debt-listed entities

To ensure parity between the provisions under the LODR Regulations for equity and debt-listed entities, SEBI has proposed a modification to Regulation 52(2)(b) of the LODR Regulations. This modification mandates that the quarterly financial results must be approved by the board of directors.

Additionally, the financial results submitted to the stock exchange must be signed by the chairperson, managing director, or a whole-time director, or, in their absence, by any other director of the listed entity who has been duly authorised by the board of directors to sign the financial results.

Comments
Currently, Regulation 33(2)(b) of the LODR Regulations, 2015, for entities with listed specified securities, requires financial results submitted to the stock exchange to be signed by the chairperson, managing director, or a whole-time director, or in their absence, by any other director authorised by the board. Conversely, Regulation 52(2)(b) for entities with listed non-convertible securities mandates that quarterly results be recorded by the board and signed by the managing director or executive director.

The proposed modification aims to create consistency between the requirements for equity and debt-listed entities by aligning the signing authority for financial results. This change simplifies the compliance process, ensures uniform governance practices across different types of listed entities and enhances the transparency and reliability of financial disclosures.

3.2 Alignment of provisions regarding Fraud/Default disclosure for Equity and Debt-Listed Entities

In the absence of a specific definition of fraud and default for debt-listed entities, SEBI has proposed to align Clause A.17 of Part B of Schedule III with Clause A.6 of Part A of Schedule III of the LODR Regulations.

Comments
Schedule III of the LODR Regulations outlines disclosure requirements for events affecting the price of securities. Part A of Schedule III, read with Regulation 30, applies to specified securities. Clause A.6 of Part A of Schedule III, mandates disclosure of frauds or defaults by the listed entity, its promoters, directors, KMPs, senior management, or subsidiaries, including arrests, whether in India or abroad. This clause is specified for equity-listed entities, with defined terms for ‘Fraud’ and ‘Default’.

On the other hand, Part B of Schedule III, read with Regulation 51(2), pertains to listed non-convertible securities. Clause A.17 of Part B requires disclosure of similar issues involving promoters, KMPs, directors, employees, or the entity itself or the arrest of a KMP or promoter. This clause applies to debt-listed entities.

This alignment ensures that definitions and reporting obligations for price-sensitive information are consistent, enhancing clarity and reducing ambiguity. This change is expected to streamline compliance, facilitate better regulatory oversight, and ensure that all listed entities adhere to uniform standards for reporting significant events affecting security prices.

3.3 Reduction in the timeline for record date intimation to stock exchanges to ‘at least three working days’

The SEBI has proposed reducing the timeline for intimating the record date to stock exchanges by an entity having listed non-convertible securities from at least seven working days to at least three working days.

Comments
Regulation 60(2) of the LODR Regulations requires entities with listed non-convertible securities to notify stock exchanges of the record date at least seven working days in advance, excluding the intimation and record dates. Similarly, Regulation 42 mandates equity-listed entities to do the same. However, for rights issues, the proviso to Regulation 42(2) reduces this notice period to at least three working days.

The proposed reduction in the timeline for intimation of record date from 7 to 3 working days aims to streamline the process and provide greater flexibility for entities having listed non-convertible securities. This change is expected to improve operational efficiency, enabling companies to respond quickly to market conditions while ensuring timely investor notifications and regulatory compliance.

3.4 Filing of all disclosures by a listed entity having NCS with stock exchanges to be in XBRL format

The SEBI has proposed a similar provision regarding disclosures to be filed in XBRL format for debt-listed entities as specified for equity-listed entities.

Comments
Presently, in the absence of any specific provision in the LODR Regulations and the Master Circular for listing obligations and disclosure requirements for non-convertible securities, securitised debt instruments and/or commercial paper dated May 21, 2024, regarding the filing of information under XBRL or PDF format, entities are submitting disclosures to the stock exchanges in both XBRL and PDF formats.

The shift to XBRL-only filings will streamline the disclosure process, enhance data accuracy, and improve regulatory oversight. This alignment between debt-listed and equity-listed entities will also ensure consistency in reporting standards.

3.5 Relaxation from ISIN restriction limit for unlisted ISINs converted to listed ISINs

The SEBI has proposed that unlisted ISINs outstanding as on December 31, 2023, converted to listed ISINs, subsequent to the introduction of Regulation 62A, may be exempted from the limit of 14 ISINs.

Comments
Regulation 60(2) of the LODR Regulations requires entities with listed non-convertible securities to notify stock exchanges of the record date at least seven working days in advance, excluding the intimation and record dates. Similarly, Regulation 42 mandates equity-listed entities to do the same. However, for rights issues, the proviso to Regulation 42(2) reduces this notice period to at least three working days.

The proposed reduction in the timeline for intimation of record date from 7 to 3 working days aims to streamline the process and provide greater flexibility for entities having listed non-convertible securities. This change is expected to improve operational efficiency, enabling companies to respond quickly to market conditions while ensuring timely investor notifications and regulatory compliance.

4. Conclusion

SEBI’s proposed reforms for non-convertible securities represent a significant step toward harmonising compliance and reporting requirements with those for equity-listed entities. These reforms are designed to simplify regulatory requirements, reduce compliance costs, and promote transparency, ultimately fostering a more efficient and investor-friendly market environment.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied