[Analysis] Audit Quality Maturity Model (AQMM) by ICAI – Enhancing Audit Standards and Firm Maturity Levels
- Blog|Account & Audit|
- 6 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 August, 2024
The Audit Quality Maturity Model (AQMM) is a framework developed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) through its Centre for Audit Quality (CAQ) to assess and enhance the audit quality of Chartered Accountant firms. It evaluates firms' maturity in key areas such as Practice Management, Human Resource Management, and Digital Competency, assigning scores that categorize firms into four maturity levels. AQMM aims to elevate audit standards, boost stakeholder confidence, and ensure that firms provide reliable, independent assurance in financial reporting. The model applies to firms auditing listed entities, banks, and insurance companies, and its results are made publicly accessible to foster transparency and accountability.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Audit Quality Maturity Model (AQMM)
- Background of AQMM
- Applicability of AQMM
- AQMM v 2.0 – Sections and Scores
- Firm Maturity Level
- Interpretation of the Level Obtained by the Firm
- Who Shall Conduct AQMM?
- Conclusion
1. Introduction
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has established the Centre for Audit Quality (CAQ), which intends to elevate audit standards across Chartered Accountant firms. This initiative aims to boost stakeholder confidence, reliability, and transparency in auditing. Since its launch, CAQ has consistently introduced tools and models to improve “Audit Quality.” A key development is the Audit Quality Maturity Model (AQMM), which assists firms in evaluating their “Audit Maturity” and pinpointing improvement areas. This model is pivotal in ensuring that firms provide dependable independent assurance, thus elevating the confidence of financial statement users.
2. Audit Quality Maturity Model (AQMM)
Developed by the CAQ of ICAI, the AQMM is grounded in thorough Audit Quality Indicators (AQI) research. This comprehensive model evaluates critical aspects of audit engagements and practices at the firm level, organized into three main sections:
- Practice Management (Operations)
- Human Resource Management
- Digital Competence
The AQMM assigns up to 600 points to firms. Scores from each section determine the firm’s categorization into one of four maturity levels, from Level 1 to Level 4.
3. Background of AQMM
Initially introduced as “AQMM v 1.0” in July 2021, the model became mandatory for audit firm assessments on September 13, 2022. Recognizing the need for advancements, the ICAI Council, in its 432nd meeting, approved an exposure draft for “AQMM v 2.0.” This draft was open for public comment from July 12 to August 2, 2024. After considering the feedback, AQMM v 2.0 was officially ratified on August 22, 2024.
4. Applicability of AQMM
The AQMM applies to firms auditing the following types of entities:
- Listed entities
- Banks (excluding cooperative banks)
- Insurance companies
Firms that exclusively conduct branch audits are not included under this model.
5. AQMM v 2.0 – Sections and Scores
AQMM v 2.0 is structured into three critical sections:
- Practice Management – Assurance
- Human Resource Management
- Digital Competency
The scoring and weighting for each section are detailed below:
Section Reference | Maximum Score | % Weightage |
Section 1 | Practice Management – Assurance | 370 | 61.67 |
Section 2 | Human Resource Management | 150 | 25.00 |
Section 3 | Digital Competency | 80 | 13.33 |
Total | 600 | 100.00 |
Each section is further broken down into specific criteria explained in the following paragraphs. To reach a specific maturity level under AQMM, a firm must achieve at least 30% in each section.
5.1 Practice Management – Assurance
Effective practice management is crucial for optimizing workflows, managing client relationships efficiently, and complying with regulatory requirements. It facilitates the smooth operation of a firm and establishes the groundwork for sustainable growth, improved client satisfaction, and long-term success. Within the “Practice Management – Assurance” section, firms can earn 370 points across ten distinct criteria. The criteria and their respective maximum scores are outlined in the table below:
S.N | Score Criteria | Maximum Score |
1. | Practice Areas of the Firm | 7 |
2. | Workflow – Practice Manuals | 12 |
3. | Service Delivery – Effort monitoring | 20 |
4. | Quality Control for engagements | 8 |
5. | Client Sensitization | 8 |
6. | Regulatory Compliances | 55 |
7. | Practice Management – Strategic/Functional | 12 |
8. | Infrastructure – Physical | 12 |
9. | Practice Credentials | 6 |
10. | Presence and implementation of Formats/Checklists/Templates | 230 |
Total | 370 |
5.2 Human Resource Management
Human Resource Management is crucial for any firm as it focuses on managing its most valuable asset—people. This section supports the firm in critical areas such as Recruitment and Staffing, Training and Development, Compensation and Benefits, and Strategic Planning. Given its significant impact on maintaining firm quality, the CAQ has designated “Human Resource Management” as the second section in the AQMM. Within this section, firms can achieve a total score of 150, distributed across six criteria. The specific criteria and their maximum possible scores are detailed in the table below:
S.N | Score Criteria | Maximum Score |
1. | Policies and Practices | 21 |
2. | Resource Planning & Monitoring as per the firm’s policy | 12 |
3. | Employee Training & Development | 52 |
4. | Resources Turnover & Compensation Management | 21 |
5. | Qualification Skill Set of employees | 28 |
6. | Performance evaluation measures carried out by the firm (KPI’s) | 16 |
Total | 150 |
5.3 Digital Competency
Adopting advanced technology has significantly enhanced the quality of audits conducted by firms. However, careless application of technology can lead to adverse outcomes. The CAQ believes that firms must be well-prepared to handle the challenges of technological advancements. Given these considerations, “Digital Competency” has been established as the third section of the AQMM. In this section, firms can achieve a total score of eighty, divided among fifteen distinct criteria. Below is a table detailing each of these criteria and the maximum scores that can be awarded:
S.N | Score Criteria | Maximum Score |
1. | Managing Digital Identity | 8 |
2. | Operational Process Automation | 6 |
3. | Centralized file storage system/server | 8 |
4. | Application for invoicing and receivable management | 2 |
5. | Redundancy and Continuity | 4 |
6. | Laptop and Data Security | 11 |
7. | Copyright and Licenses | 2 |
8. | Digital Media for Communication | 4 |
9. | Protecting Personal Data and Privacy | 6 |
10. | Information Systems Related Audits/ Reviews | 3 |
11. | Design of Application Level Controls | 1 |
12. | Custody of Digital Assets | 4 |
13. | Availability of qualified resource pool and talent development relating to digital competencies | 9 |
14. | Level of automation relating to audit processes and nature of audit services being rendered | 11 |
15. | Adaptation of advanced and emerging technologies | 1 |
Total | 80 |
6. Firm Maturity Level
The following range of scores determines the firm’s maturity level under AQMM v 2.0:
Level | Scores Received | |
Greater than or equal to | Less than | |
Level 1 Firm | 30% | 50% |
Level 2 Firm | 50% | 70% |
Level 3 Firm | 70% | 85% |
Level 4 Firm | 85% | 100% |
7. Interpretation of the Level Obtained by the Firm
- Level 1 – Indicates that the firm is in its developmental stages and must urgently enhance its competencies to prevent lagging in industry standards.
- Level 2 – Shows that the firm has made notable progress but needs to refine its efforts to ascend to higher competency levels.
- Level 3 – Signifies significant advancement, with the firm encouraged to polish its practices further to reach the pinnacle of industry competency.
- Level 4 – Represents the highest level of maturity, indicating that the firm has excellently adopted and integrated standards and procedures. The focus at this stage should be on continual optimization and innovation.
8. Who Shall Conduct AQMM?
The AQMM review is conducted by a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, who is also empanelled as a peer reviewer. The Peer Review Board appoints such reviewers to conduct AQMM assessments anytime before a firm’s scheduled peer review cycle is due. Following the review, the determined level of the firm, along with the details of the peer review certificate, will be published on the ICAI website for public access.
9. Conclusion
Implementing the AQMM represents a crucial advancement by the ICAI in elevating the audit quality of Chartered Accountant firms. This model is essential in fostering trust and confidence among stakeholders by ensuring that audit firms adhere to rigorous standards. The transparency provided by making the AQMM results publicly accessible on the ICAI website boosts client confidence. It supports the ICAI’s broader mission to enhance transparency, reliability, and trust in financial reporting. Overall, the AQMM serves as a pivotal tool in upholding the integrity and quality of the auditing profession, benefiting both the firms and their clients.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied