Writ Petition Filed against SCN without Filing Reply was Pre-mature & not Maintainable: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 April, 2023
Case Details: Coimbatore Compressor Engineering Company (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of GST and Central Excise - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 215 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Abdul Quddhose, J.
- Ms Naveena D. for the Petitioner.
- Ms Hema Murali Krishnan & V. Sundareswaran for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was supplying materials to railways. It received show cause notice from the department and it was alleged that goods were not correctly classified. The petitioner filed writ petition to challenge the notice by contending that the impugned goods could not be used for any other purpose as same was exclusively designed for use by railways.
According to the petitioner, arbitrarily and by total non-application of mind and without any data to that effect, the petitioner had been called upon to explain under the impugned show cause notice as to why the classification in respect of the petitioner’s goods will not fall under Chapters 84 and 85 of the Customs Tariff Act 1975
However, the department contended that after making minor alterations, the impugned goods sold could be used for other purposes also.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the impugned show cause notice had given reasons as to why goods would be classifiable under Chapters 84 and 85 of Customs Tariff Act and not under Chapter 86. The petitioner had to respond to SCN stating his objections but without responding to impugned SCN the petitioner had approached Court prematurely. Therefore, the Court dismissed the petition and petitioner was directed to submit reply to impugned SCN.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied