Writ Petition Filed Against Denial of ITC Claim to be Rejected Since Petitioner Didn’t Reply & Appear on Date of Hearing | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 12 October, 2023
Case Details: Ansil Ibrahim v. Assistant Commissioner - [2023] 155 taxmann.com 186 (Kerala)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
- A. Krishnan, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Jasmine M.M. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the Assessing Authority denied the claim of input tax credit of the petitioner. The interest and penalty was also levied since the Assessing Authority verified the input tax credit as per GSTR-2A and return as per GSTR-3B for the tax period 2017-18. The petitioner filed writ petition against the denial of credit.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the department issued notice to the petitioner to show cause why credit should not be denied but the petitioner did not appear in pursuance of the show cause notice nor did he provide any document or evidence to discharge his burden under section 155 of the GST Act.
Therefore, the Assessing Authority had no other material before them except Form GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B since the petitioner himself had given up his right to prove his claim for the input tax credit. Thus, it was held that Court cannot help such an assessee by entertaining this writ petition and dismissed the petition.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied