Writ Petition Dismissed as Assessee Failed to Cooperate in Assessment Proceedings: HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 30 June, 2023
Case Details: Seoyon E-Hwa Summit Automotive India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner (ST)-I - [2023] 151 taxmann.com 506 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dr. Anita Sumanth, J.
- Sri Prakash & P.V. Sudakar for the Petitioner.
- V. Prashanth Kiran for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee received various notices including a show cause notice from the GST department. The issue in the said notices was related to the Input Tax Credit but the assessee had not furnished any reply and therefore order was passed on basis of available material.
It filed an application under Section 161 of CGST Act, 2017 seeking rectification of errors allegedly apparent on record which was rejected on ground that various opportunities were already granted to assessee. It filed writ petition against the impugned order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the assessee was given sufficient opportunities prior to finalisation of assessment to justify its claim of ITC. It should have responded to the notices & furnished the break-up of the ITC claimed under GSTR 3B as sought for by the officer.
However, the assessee had not cooperated in the proceedings for assessment and the officer was bound to complete the assessment on the basis of the available materials and without any explanations for its benefit. Since, any solitary attempt to cooperate or assist in assessment proceedings was not made, the assessee could not lay blame at doorstep of revenue. Therefore, the Court held that the petition was liable to be dismissed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied