Writ couldn’t be filed against issue that no adequate opportunity was provided to assessee: HC

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 20 September, 2022

writ petition

Case Details: Sri Chandra Sekar Reddy Bokkalapall v. National Faceless Assessment Centre - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 109 (Telangana)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Ujjal Bhuyan & Dr. C. Sumalatha, JJ.

Facts of the Case

The instant writ petition was filed by the assessee against the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO). AO served draft assessment order dated 4-9-2021 upon the assessee on 6-9-2021 and asked him to submit his response within three days, i.e., by 9-9-2021.

Assessee requested AO for a further one month to submit a response but AO granted time only till 13-9-2021. To ensure that the assessee did not go unrepresented before the final assessment order was passed, general response was submitted by him. Thereafter, the impugned order was passed under section 147 read with sections 144 and 144B. The assessee filed a writ petition before the High Court against the said order.

High Court Held

The Telangana High Court held that there was no dispute to the proposition that if there is a violation of the principles of natural justice or violation of fundamental rights, the High Court can invoke its extraordinary jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India notwithstanding the availability of alternative remedies.

Whether the opportunity of hearing granted and availed was adequate or reasonable would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. There cannot be any straight jacket formula.

If the assessee contended that the opportunity of hearing was inadequate which affected his right to make a proper response, certainly the same can be gone into by the appellate authority, since it may require examination of facts which the High Court isn’t inclined to do in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction.

Thus, the assessee was relegated to the forum of appeal before the first appellate authority i.e., Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) under section 246A.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied