Voluntary Deposit Made Under Protest During Adjudication to be Treated as Part of Pre-deposit for Filing Appeal | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 14 August, 2023
Case Details: Vinod Metal v. State of Maharashtra - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 322 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Jitendra Jain & G.S. Kulkarni, JJ.
- Rahul Thakar & C.B. Thakar for the Petitioner.
- Smt. Jyoti Chavan, Dushant Kumar, Manish Upadhye, Himanshu Takke, AGP’s & Karan Adhik for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the petitioner approached High Court alleging that GSTN Portal prevented it from lodging/filing of a statutory appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act without fulfilment of pre-deposit at the time of appeal. The petitioner contended that for the purpose of the pre-deposit, the amount voluntarily deposited under protest to be accepted towards fulfilment of such pre-deposit. However, the department contended that such deposit was not available for compliance of sub-section (6) of Section 107 of the CGST Act.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that an amount deposited under sub-section (5) section 73 of CGST Act is not an amount, which is deposited in pursuance of any demand or any assessment order. It would be certainly a voluntary deposit and such deposit would be accounted in event of any liability of assessee to pay tax, and would be integral to assessment. Therefore, the Court held that such deposit cannot be excluded from consideration for purpose of compliance of pre-deposit as mandated by sub-section (6) of Section 107.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- VVF (India) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2023) 4 Centax 421/2023 (72) G.S.T.L. 444 (SC) (para 10) followed.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- VVF (India) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra [2023] 4 Centax 421/2023 (72) G.S.T.L. 444 (SC) [Para 3]
- A.V. Fernandez v. State of Kerala AIR 1957 SC 657 (para 10)
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied