Volleyball Federation didn’t deny players to participate in a Volleyball league, no abuse of dominance: CCI
- Blog|News|Competition Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 September, 2021
Case details: Shravan Yadav v. Volleyball Federation of India - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 405 (CCI)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Ashok Kumar Gupta, Chairperson MS. Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi, Member.
- Ashish Kothari, Adv., Jayant Kumar, Adv. Sandeep Bisht, Adv. and Raman Grover, CEO for the Appearing Parties.
Facts of the Case
Volleyball Federation of India (VFI) was a National Sports Federation for Volleyball in India which is recognized by the Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports and Baseline. It was engaged in the business of providing consultancy services, arranging sponsorships, marketing brands, and sports events, etc.
The VFI agreed with Baseline granting exclusive rights to it for organizing a Volleyball League for Men, Women, and Beach Volleyball in India for the next 10 years. However, the Informant, Volleyball player, registered with VFI filed information alleging contravention of section 4 of the CCI Act.
The Informant had alleged that certain clauses of the agreement restricted the market of organizing Volleyball leagues for all other persons/enterprises except for Baseline for ten years at any level in India or abroad. It also restricted the availability of Volleyball players for other leagues by imposing restrictions upon them not to participate in any other league in India or abroad.
The Players were also restricted from participating even in global events like Asian Games, Olympics, or Volleyball World Cup if dates of said events clash with Baseline’s Volleyball League.
CCI Held
The CCI noted that there was nothing on record to indicate that players of Volleyball much fewer informants were denied any effective opportunity to participate either in Volleyball League or any other tournament of Volleyball, held in-country or abroad during the relevant period. There was also nothing on record to indicate that the formation of any other league for Volleyball or any tournament during the relevant period was thwarted either directly or indirectly by VFI. Therefore, no case was made out against VFI for contravention of a section of the CCI Act.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Surinder Singh Barmi v. Board for Control of Cricket in India [2017] 87 taxmann.com 336 (CCI) (para 10)
- Hemant Sharma v. All India Chess Federation (AICE) [2018] 96 taxmann.com 35 (CCI) (para 11)
- Dhanraj Pillay v. Hockey India [Case No. 73 of 2011, dated 31-5-2013] (para 11)
- Motosyklestistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) v. Elliniko Dimosio [2008] ECR I – 4863 (para 18)
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied