Transfer of Shares by Karta to HUF is Neither an Acquisition Nor it Triggers Obligation to Make an Open Offer Under SAST

  • Blog|News|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 27 September, 2023

Transfer of Shares by Karta to HUF

Case Details: Pooja R Tikmani v. Securities and Exchange Board of India - [2023] 154 taxmann.com 202 (SAT-Mumbai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer & Ms Meera Swarup, Technical Member
    • Paritosh Gupta, Adv. for the Appellant.
    • Sumit RaiRavishekhar PandeyMs Shefali ShankarAmarpal Singh Dua, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, during the year 2010-11, there was an increase in the shareholding of the appellant (i.e. promoter of the target company) in excess of the threshold limit prescribed under the Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover Regulations, 1997 (SAST). Consequently, the appellants were obliged to make a public announcement.

The Adjudicating Officer of the SEBI had alleged violation of regulation 14(1) of the SAST Regulations on the ground that the manager responsible for opening an offer had made a public announcement in the year 2016, i.e. after a delay of 4 years and 7 months.

In response, the SEBI by the impugned order imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the appellants. It was noted that an open offer was made for the acquisition of additional shares of the year 2016 and not for the acquisition of shares of the year 2011.

Thus, there was no alleged delay nor there was any violation of regulation 14(1) of the SAST Regulations. Assuming that there was a possible violation of SAST Regulations as an open offer was not made in 2011, there was an inordinate delay of 10 years in the initiation of proceedings.

SAT Held

The SAT noted that acquisition if any was made in year 2011. Such transfer of shares was made known to the stock exchange and was in the public domain. Therefore, the mere fact that such acquisition came to their knowledge only when an additional offer was being made in the year 2016 was incorrect and was not a ground to initiate the proceedings nor could it condone the inordinate delay.

As a result, the SAT held that the impugned order could not be sustained and was to be quashed.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied