Time Limit for Issuing Notice u/s 148 Extended Till 30-06-2021 is Not Applicable to AY 2013-14 | Bombay HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 18 January, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. ACIT - [2024] 158 taxmann.com 367 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- K.R. Shriram & Dr. Neela Gokhale, JJ.
- P.J. Pardiwalla, Sr. Adv. Harsh Kapadia & Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.
- Akhileshwar Sharma for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee filed the instant writ petition challenging the issue of section 148 notice for the Assessment Year 2013-14. Assessee contended that the reopening notice was issued beyond the period of limitation.
Assessee also contended that CBDT’s Instruction 1/2022 to revive notice issued under the old regime was beyond jurisdiction, illegal, contrary to directions of the Apex Court given in the case of Ashish Agarwal v. ITO [2022] 130 taxmann.com 246 (SC).
High Court Held
The Bombay High Court held that a notice under section 148 could not be issued to reopen the assessment in a case where the right to reopen the assessment was already barred under the pre-amended Act on the date when new legislation came into force.
Therefore, where the limitation under Act (erstwhile section 149) for reopening the assessment for assessment year 2013-14 expired on 31-3-2020, notice issued in June 2021 in case of the assessee was barred by limitation. Thus, reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant to the judgment in Ashish Agarwal v. ITO [2022] 130 taxmann.com 246 (SC) will also be regarded as beyond the time limit.
Since the limitation under erstwhile section 149 for reopening the assessment for the assessment year 2013-14 expired on 31-3-2020, CBDT Notification No.20/2021 would not apply to facts of the present case and even relate back theory of AO could not safeguard reassessment proceedings initiated after 1-4-2021.
Accordingly, section 148 notice dated 28-7-2022 issued pursuant to Ashish Agarwal v. ITO [2022] 130 taxmann.com 246 (SC) and CBDT Instruction No. 1/2022 to revive notice issued under the old regime was to be quashed and set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
