Single Judge’s Direction Restraining Appellant from Invoking Guarantee Overturned as he wasn’t Aware of Prior Encashment | HC

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 2 August, 2023

guarantee issued by corporate debtor

Case Details: Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. EMC Ltd. - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 358 (HC-Calcutta)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Prakash Shrivastava, CJ. & Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.
    • S.N. Mookherjee, AG, Anirban Ray, GP, Aritra BasuDebabrata DasSaptarishi MukherjeeTirthankar Nandi, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Joy Saha, Sr. Adv., Deepan SarkarPratik MukhopadhyaAnirban PramanickMs Subhasree Dey, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the corporate debtor entered into contracts with the appellant company relating to the supply and construction of power transmission lines. The corporate debtor furnished a performance guarantee/bank guarantee to the appellant. The corporate debtor entered into the CIRP and a moratorium was imposed.

The work was completed by the corporate debtor but the appellant instead of returning the bank guarantee invoked and encashed it. A writ petition was filed by the corporate debtor wherein a Single Judge passed the impugned order restraining the appellant from invoking the bank guarantee of the corporate debtor, noting that the corporate debtor had entered into the CIRP.

The High Court observed that since the bank guarantee was encashed prior to the impugned order, and the same was not brought to the notice of the Single Judge, the impugned direction could not survive.

High Court Held

The High Court held that since conclusions drawn in the impugned order for deciding prayer for interim relief were before the exchange of affidavits, the same was to be held tentative in nature.

Further, the appellant was to be permitted to file an affidavit in the pending writ petition, which was to be decided on its own merits. Accordingly, the appeal was disposed of.

List of Cases Referred to

    • EMC Ltd. v. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. [WPA 14603 of 2022, dated 10-8-2022] (para 1).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied