Share valuation report by CA can’t be accepted if it is based on only basic info. supplied by management: ITAT
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 6 December, 2022
Case Details: ITO v. LNB Renewable Energy (P.) Ltd. - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 269 (Kolkata-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member & Dr Manish Borad, Accountant Member
- M.P. Lohia, CA & Nikhil Kanodia, CA for the Appellant.
- Biswanath Das, CIT(D/R) for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee-company was engaged in the business of production and generation of renewable energy. During the year, a large share premium was received on the introduction of Capital. Upon scrutiny, the assessee submitted financial statements and other details along with a Valuation Report provided by an independent Chartered Accountant.
Rejecting the valuation report, the Assessing Officer (AO) invoked Section 56(2)(viib) and made additions to the income alleging the share premium received is in excess of the Fair Market Value of shares.
On appeal, CIT (A) deleted the additions made by AO. Aggrieved-AO filed an appeal before the Kolkata Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that the assessee had two wholly owned subsidiaries and two step-down subsidiaries. The valuation of the assessee was computed after considering the net worth of two step-down subsidiaries. It should be noted that such subsidiaries were acquired after the valuation date.
The valuation report prepared by the Chartered Accountant (CA), was based on the basic information, supplied by the management of the assessee. The fact of acquiring wholly owned subsidiaries/step-down subsidiaries after the cut-off date of the valuation of shares was not provided to CA. Thus, the results arrived at in the valuation report could not have been accepted.
Therefore, the provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) had rightly been invoked by AO.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied