Service tax shall not be included in gross receipts of a foreign airline for computing presumptive income
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 12 September, 2022
Case Details: Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. v. ACIT - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 196 (Kolkata-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member & Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member
- Amal Kamat, CIT DR for the Appellant.
- J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. & Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee, a non-resident airline company, filed its return of income reporting total income on the presumptive basis under section 44BBA. During the assessment proceeding, AO asked the assessee to explain the difference in gross receipts disclosed in the return of income and the service tax return. The assessee submitted the necessary details and explanations as required by the AO. After considering the assessee’s reply, it was found that the difference was due to service tax. The assessee had not included the service tax collected from customers in gross receipts for computing income under section 44BBA.
ITAT Held
In appeal, the Tribunal held that the expression “amount paid or payable” in section 44BBA(2)(a) and the expression “amount received or deemed to be received” in section 44BBA(2)(b) is qualified by the words “on account of the carriage of passengers, live stock material or goods from any place in India/outside India”. Therefore, only such amounts which are paid or payable for the service provided by the assessee can form part of the gross receipts for the purpose of computation of gross total income under section 44BBA(1).
Service tax collected by the assessee does not have any element of income. It is collected by the assessee from its customers for and on behalf of the Central Government on account of a statutory levy and, therefore, it does not form part of the receipts of the assessee on which income accrues or arises to it. Assessee merely acts as a collection agent for and on behalf of the Central Government and after collection, deposits the service tax so collected into the treasury of the Central Government. Hence, AO was directed to re-compute the income under section 44BBA by excluding the service tax component.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied