Section 16(4) of CGST Act is Constitutionally Valid & Not violative of Articles 19(1) (g) or Article 300-A of Constitution of India | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 18 September, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Gobinda Construction v. Union of India - [2023] 154 taxmann.com 311 (Patna)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Chakradhari Sharan Singh & Madhuresh Prasad, JJ.
- D.V. Pathy, Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Anurag Saurav, Archana Sinha & Archana Shahi for the Petitioner. & Others.
- Dr K.N. Singh, Dr Krishna Nandan Singh, Vikash Kumar & Vivek Prasad for the Respondent.& Others.
Facts of the Case
In the present petition, the petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 which denies entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of any invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or both after 30th November following the end of financial year to which such invoice or invoice relating to such debit note pertains or furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier. It was contended that this provision was violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the language of Section 16 of CGST Act suffers from no ambiguity and clearly stipulates that ITC shall be available subject to conditions and restrictions put thereunder. In order to invoke Article 300-A of Constitution by a person, two circumstances must jointly exist i.e. deprivation of property of a person and lack of sanction of law.
However, the provision under sub-section (4) of section 16 is one of conditions which makes a registered person entitled to take ITC and by no means it can be said to be violative of article 300-A of Constitution of India. Further, the fiscal legislation having uniform application to all registered persons, cannot be said to be violative of Article 19(1)(g).
Thus, the Court held that the sub-section (4) of section 16 of CGST Act is constitutionally valid and not violative of Article 19(1)(g) and Article 300-A of Constitution of India.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
