Sec. 12AA Registration Can’t Be Denied Merely on Ground That Trust Was Formed to Comply With CSR Requirements | ITAT
- News|Blog|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 December, 2023
Case Details: Santosh Foundation v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) - [2023] 157 taxmann.com 388 (Amritsar-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Anikesh Banerjee, Judicial Member & Dr. M.l. Meena, Accountant Member
- Sudhir Sehgal & P.N. Arora, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Hitendra Bhauraoji Ninawe, CIT DR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee-society was formed to implement the CSR activities of parental company. The assessee-society filed an application for registration under section 12AA.
The Commissioner (Exemption) denied the application, stating that the society was created solely to carry out CSR activities for the parent company and, due to its limited composition, did not serve the general public or qualify as a public charitable company.
The matter reached before the Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that the assessee’s primary goal was to carry out CSR activities for the parent company, with a broader benefit to the public. The CIT(Exemption) remarks are considered vague, as the focus during 12AA registration should be on the charitable nature and genuine activities, leaving other assessments to the Assessing Officer during the exemption process under section 11, read with section 13.
The Commissioner (Exemption) has neither pointed out any defect in the objects of the trust nor doubted the activities carried out to achieve these objects. Therefore, the application for registration cannot be rejected.
The grievance of the assessee was genuine as the order of the Commissioner (Exemption) was infirm and perverse to the facts on record and, as such, is bad in law. Accordingly, the Commissioner (Exemption) is directed to grant registration to the appellant Trust under section 12AA from the date of application.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Nanak Chand Jain Charitable Trust v. CIT (Exemption) (2018) 91 taxmann.com 197 (Delhi – Trib.) (para 9)
- CIT v. IILM Foundation Academy [2016] 389 ITR 148 (Delhi)
- Cyberstar Educational Society v. CIT (Exemptions) (para 11) – followed.
- Goenka Charitable Trust v. CIT(E) [2018] 80 taxmann.com 311 (Amritsar – Trib.) (Para 8) – Distinguished.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied