Search Authorization Was Erroneous If Grounds Set Out in Authorization Were Not Borne Out From Information on Record | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 15 December, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Bhagat Ram Om Prakash Agro (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner Central Tax GST - [2023] 157 taxmann.com 258 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Vibhu Bakhru & Amit Mahajan, JJ.
- Avi Singh, Tanuj Bhadana & Shikhar Garg, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Atul Tripathi, V.K. Attri, Advs., Pawan Kumar & Rajesh Kumar, Superintendents for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, inspection was conducted pursuant to the order passed by the Special Judge, whereby the learned Special Judge had directed to check the source of Rs. 50,00,000/- received by the petitioner. The petitioner filed writ petition and challenged the search authorisation by contending that none of grounds as set out in search authorization were borne out from information or material on record of revenue authority.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that there were no reasons for the department to initiate the search against the petitioner under section 67(1) of the CGST Act and the record did not indicate that any further investigation was conducted prior to authorizing the inspection under section 67(1) of the CGST Act.
Also, the authorization was patently erroneous as none of grounds as set out in authorization for search were borne out from information or material on record. Therefore, the Court directed department to return all documents to the petitioner since the conditions for inspection under section 67(1) of the CGST Act were not satisfied.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
