SCN issued to valuer w.r.t eligibility quashed in absence of direct allegation against her: IBBI
- Blog|News|Company Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 May, 2022
Case Details: Ms.Esther Rani Jakkula, In re - [2022] 137 taxmann.com 292 (IBBI)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dr. Mukulita Vijayawargiya, Member
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, an FIR was filed under section 120B, read with sections 420, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the basis of a complaint made by State Bank of India in respect of providing inflated valuation of properties which were kept as collateral for a loan amount disbursed by SBI to Mr. Paruchiru Kumar (‘P’).
The authority sent an e-mail to Ms. Rani (‘R’), a member of IOV Registered Valuers Foundation (IOVRVF) and registered with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) as a valuer in asset class of Land and Building, seeking clarification from her regarding the said FIR, along with the submission of necessary documents.
However, no response was received from ‘R’. Thereafter, the authority issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) under rule 17 of Valuer Rules to ‘R’ for contravention of rule 3(1) of Valuer Rules providing for eligibility of registered valuer. However, ‘R’ did not respond to show cause notice. In fact, ‘R’ submitted that she didn’t receive any information from CBI regarding FIR and came to know about the same from IOVRVF.
Further, she also submitted that valuation report submitted by her was correct and no inflated rates of the said properties were valued by her. Later on, it was found that ‘R’ was not aware of SCN because of some problem in her computer.
IBBI Held
It was held that since, ‘R’ had not been named as accused in FIR registered by CBI, and there was no direct allegation on her and the case was under investigation, the contraventions alleged in SCN did not appear to be established. Thus, the SCN was disposed of without any further directions and ‘R’ was advised to be extremely careful, diligent, and responsive while performing her duties as a registered valuer under the Valuer Rules.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Cushman & Wakefield India (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India [2019] 102 taxmann.com 102/152 SCL 516 (Delhi) (para 4.2).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied