SC Dismissed SLP Against HC’s Order Granting Interest on Refund of Excess Recovery of Tax to VIVO
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 13 January, 2024
Case Details: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Vivo Mobile India (P.) Ltd. - [2024] 158 taxmann.com 276 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Mrs B.V. Nagarathna & Augustine George Masih, JJ.
- N. Venkatraman, Sr. Adv. Andleeb Naqvi, Chandrashekhar, Ankit Khatri, Advs. & Bhakti Vardhan Singh, AOR for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the Revenue filed Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the order of the Honourable High Court wherein it was held that in terms of first proviso to Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, 2017, the assessee was entitled to file monthly return in Form GSTR-3B in September, 2020, by claiming cumulative adjustment of differential ITC for disputed period February, 2020 to August, 2020 and directed to refund the amount recovered. However, the department contended that there was no excess recovery made by the department.
Supreme Court Held
The Apex Court noted that the scheme for cumulative adjustment was available for the period February, 2020 to August, 2020. Therefore, the demand of differential ITC by Revenue computed on month to month adjustment, was correctly set aside by the High Court with directions to refund excess collected amount with interest at 6% p.a. from date of payment by assessee till date of refund by Revenue.
Therefore, the Revenue should verify if there was excess collection, and if the amount collected would be found in excess, the High Court’s directions shall prevail and SLP was accordingly dismissed.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Vivo Mobile India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh [2023] 155 taxmann.com 324/100 GST 577 (All.) SLP dismissed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied