Sale of property reported by ‘Mahesh Bhupathi’ in ITR doesn’t absolve buyer’s liability to deduct tax u/s 195: ITAT
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 21 July, 2022
Case Details: Nitesh Estates Ltd. v. ADIT - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 400 (Bangalore-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Smt. Beena Pillai, Judicial Member & Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member
- V. Srinivasan, A.R. for the Appellant.
- Narayana K.R., D.R. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee was engaged in the business of real estate. It had sold one apartment in a residential complex to Mr. Mahesh Bhupathi. Later on, Mr. Mahesh Bhupathi offered to sell the same apartment back to the assessee. The assessee made payment to Mahesh Bhupathi without deducting tax at source (TDS).
The Assessing Officer (AO) held that Mahesh Bhupathi was a non-resident and thus, the assessee was liable to deduct tax on the capital gains arising from the payment made to him. AO held the assessee to be in default and levied tax & interest liability.
The assessee contended that it was not aware of the fact that Mr. Mahesh Bhupathi was a non-resident. Further, Mahesh Bhupathi had duly reported the transaction relating to the sale of the apartment in his return of income. Thus, the assessee cannot be considered an assessee in default.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that the claim of the assessee that it was unaware of the residential status of Shri Mahesh Bhupathi cannot be accepted as he was associated with the assessee for a long time. Facts on record show that the assessee was well aware of the residential status of Mahesh Bhupathi and thus it was liable to deduct tax as per the provisions of section 195.
Section 195 casts obligations upon the payer to deduct tax at source on the sum paid to the non-resident payee. The legislature incorporated provisions like section 195 under the Income-tax Act to prevent NRIs from taking away the entire money abroad without paying the due tax. The Indian tax authorities will have no control once this sum of money is thrashed away.
Further, as per section 195, it is not relevant whether NR-payee has reported income in ITR or he does not have positive income in the A.Y. under consideration. If the payment in question is chargeable to tax, then the person making the payment is obliged to deduct tax at source.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied