RP’s Request to Restrain ED’s Lease Collection Quashed for Suppressing Fact that ED’s had Physical Possession of Property
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 August, 2023
Case Details: KSL & Industries Ltd. v. Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 408 (SAFEMA-New Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Chairman & V. Anandarajan, Member
- Milen Negi, Nikhil Jha & Kiran Shah, Adv. for the Appellant.
- Nidhi Raman & Akash Mishra, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the corporate debtor i.e. ‘KSL’ was under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the appellant had been appointed as its Resolution Professional. The Appellant was collecting lease amounts from tenants of the corporate debtor’s Mall and incurring expenditures for its maintenance.
Also, an Interim application had been filed by the appellant seeking a restraint order on execution of a letter sent by ED to tenants for payment of the lease amount to them only.
Further, the Appellant had also submitted that section 32A gives immunity from provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 to the corporate debtor and the person in control of the property of the corporate debtor.
It was noted that physical possession of property laid with ED and the appellant suppressed the said fact while moving instant application. Further, the resolution plan had not been approved by the NCLT under section 31 and, thus, section 32A had no application to seek immunity from attachment under the PMLA.
Appellate Tribunal Held
The Appellate Tribunal held that the conduct of the appellant itself was sufficient to deny interim relief and therefore, the prayer of the appellant for the grant of interim order to stay execution of ED’s letter was to be rejected.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied