RP isn’t Precluded from Reporting on Limitation, NCLT Didn’t Commit Any Error in Appointing RP | NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 12 March, 2024

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Account & Audit

Classification and Disclosure of Late Payment Interest in Financial Statements

Blog, News, GST & Customs

Appellate Authority Can’t Dismiss an Appeal on Maintainability Grounds If Alternative Remedy Has Been Directed by the Court | HC

Latest from Taxmann

Resolution Professional

Case Details: CL Sharma v. Bank of Maharashtra - [2024] 160 taxmann.com 250 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson & Barun Mitra, Technical Member
    • Abhjijeet Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Akash Chatterjee, Ms Priyadarshini Dewan & Ms Shankari Mishra, Advocates for the Appellant.
    • Namit Suri, Advocate, Ravi, CS, Raman Tomar, Aman Varma & Ms Riya Wasade, Advocates for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, Respondent No. 1 (i.e. the financial creditor) extended a loan facility to the corporate debtor. In pursuance of the said loan, the appellant stood as a personal guarantor. However, the corporate debtor defaulted in making repayment of the loan amount and respondent No. 1 filed an application u/s 95 of the IBC before the NCLT against the appellant.

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) vide the impugned order admitted the said application and directed the RP to submit a report and the matter was directed to be listed on 23.02.2024. Thereafter, the appellant made an appeal before the NCLAT against the order passed by the NCLT.

The appellant contended that the account of the corporate debtor was declared NPA on 27.07.2016 and the application was filed only on 16.03.2023. Thus, the application was barred by time and the NCLT committed an error in appointing an RP in the said application.

The NCLAT observed that when the right had been given to the personal guarantor to submit its objection or explanation or information, it is open for the personal guarantor to give all necessary information and objection to the report of RP.

Further, the NCLAT observed that the report which needs to be submitted by RP u/s 99 is a report confining to procedural requirements on an application u/s 95. The RP is not supposed to submit any report regarding the question of limitation since the report u/s 99 confines to an examination as to whether an application fulfils the requirements of sections 94 and 95 and that the applicant has provided the information and given the explanation sought by the RP.

The NCLAT also referred to the judgement given by the Supreme Court in Diliip B Jiwrjka case, where the Court held that RP does not perform any adjudicatory function, nor even can take an administrative decision. The role of RP has been held to be only a facilitator.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that it is always open for the appellant to take pleas as permissible at the time of adjudication of issue, including any defect in the application u/s 95 of the IBC and the said question also does not require any consideration at the stage when RP is appointed.

Therefore, the claim of the appellant that the application was time-barred and it should have been decided at the time when the NCLT-appointed RP could not be accepted. Therefore, the NCLT did not commit any error in appointing the RP.

List of Cases Reviewed

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied