RP approved by CoC with 100% voting & NCLT approval was free from legal infirmity: NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 13 April, 2023

Resolution Plan

Case Details: Rahul Khilnani v. Atul Kumar Jain - [2023] 148 taxmann.com 404 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Anant Bijay Singh, Judicial Member & Ms Shreesha Merla, Technical Member
    • Anubhav GuptaAjit Singh Joher, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Pratik MalikMs Ekta Chaudhary, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the resolution plan submitted by the successful resolution applicant (SRA) was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) with a 100% voting share and subsequently by the Adjudicating Authority. However, the appellant (i.e. operational creditors) alleged that they were being paid only 2% under the resolution plan, while all other creditors were being paid 100%.

The appellants further claimed that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) should have allowed the CoC to reconsider their plan in the interest of justice, however the NCLT approved the said plan even when members of the CoC having 82% of voting rights moved an application under regulation 18 for convening a meeting.

Thereafter, the appellant filed an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The question raised before the NCLAT was whether the impugned order passed by the NCLT approving the resolution plan was free from any illegality and infirmity.

It was noted that 82% of the shareholders who according to the appellant had objected to the plan had attended the meeting where the plan was approved and had given their approval.

The NCLAT observed that since the resolution plan was approved by the CoC with a 100% voting share, and the operational creditors were not holding any voting right in the CoC, the commercial wisdom of the CoC was non-justiciable.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that there were no material irregularities in the resolution plan and that the 82% of shareholders who had allegedly raised objections had themselves attended the CoC meeting and approved the plan.

Therefore, the impugned order passed by the NCLT approving the resolution plan was held to be free from any illegality and infirmity.

List of Cases Reviewed

    • Imperial Fastners (P.) Ltd. v. Solven Power Systems (P.) Ltd. [2023] 148 taxmann.com 403 (NCLT – New Delhi) (para15) affirmed [See Annex].
    • Kalpraj Dharamshi v. Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd. [2021] 125 taxmann.com 194/166 SCL 583/225 Comp Case 565 (SC) (para 14) followed.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied