Resolution applicant can change nature of business of corporate debtor as long as the objective of IBC isn’t hampered

  • News|Blog|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 23 September, 2021

Approval of resolution plan Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Case details: Next Orbit Ventures Fund v. Print House (India) (P.) Ltd. - [2021] 130 taxmann.com 147 (NCLAT- New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, ACTG Chairperson, Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra and Ms. Shreesha Merla, Technical Member.
    • Kumar Anurag SinghZain A. Khan, Advs. for the Appellant. 
    • Dinakar SinghArpan Behl and Dhrupad Vaghanifor the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, a Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor filed an application invoking the provisions of Section 30(6) of the Code read with Regulation 39(4) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 for approval of the resolution plan in respect of the Corporate Debtor, against whom CIRP has been initiated before the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai.

The suspended directors and promoters of the Corporate Debtor filed an application before Adjudicating authority objecting to the approval of resolution plan, on the ground that the Resolution Applicant – ‘Sify Technologies Limited’ intends to change the main business of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ from printing business to running data centers. The said application was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority.

NCLAT Held

On appeal, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provides for the restructuring of the corporate debtor or change in portfolio of goods and services produced/rendered by the corporate debtor as long as scope and objective of code are not hampered. Therefore, if the resolution plan submitted by the successful resolution applicant contemplates a change in nature of the business to another line when the existing business was obsolete or non-viable, it could not be construed that the Resolution plan was not ‘feasible or viable’.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied