Rejection of manual GST refund claim is not sustainable: HC

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • < 1 minute
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 24 May, 2022

Rejection of manually filed GST refund claim

Case Details: Ayana Pharma Ltd. v. Union of India - [2022] 138 taxmann.com 367 (Gujarat)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • J.B. Pardiwala & Ms Nisha M. Thakore, JJ.
    • Bharat RaichandaniAditya R. Parikh for the Petitioner.
    • Priyank P. Lodha for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The writ applicant was engaged in the business of manufacture/buying and selling of pharmaceutical products. It filed an application of refund which was rejected on the ground that the writ applicant could not have filed the application manually. It filed writ petition against the same.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court observed that as per Rule 97A of CGST Rules, any reference to electronic filing of an application would include manual filing. Since rule 97A contains a non-obstante clause, it is intended to override rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules. Therefore, the rejection of refund claim on the ground that the same was not filed online but manually was not sustainable and liable to be set aside. Also, the Authority concerned was directed to treat manual application as application for refund and pass reasoned order after hearing the writ applicant.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied