Refurbishment cost not includible in purchase price under margin scheme: AAAR
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 September, 2022
Case Details: Tej Kumar Jain, In re - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 134 (AAAR-RAJASTHAN)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Satish Kumar Agrawal & Ravi Jain, Member
-
Yash Dhadda, CA for the Appellant.
Facts of the Case
The appellant planned to engage in the business of sale and purchase of old/used vehicle. To bring the purchased cars to refurbished condition, the appellant would be incurring some expenses. The appellant would not be claiming any input tax credit and wanted to pay tax on the sale of old/used cars under the margin scheme.
Notably, the GST law provides that the value of supply under the margin scheme would be the difference between the selling price and the purchase price and where the value of such supply is negative, it shall be ignored.
The appellant contended that the refurbishment cost is part of the ‘purchase cost’ and therefore, should be deducted while computing the margin under the scheme considering the intention of the law to compute the margin on the sale of goods.
AAAR Held
The Rajasthan AAAR held that from the plain reading of the provisions, the words used are ‘purchase price’ and not the ‘purchased cost’, whereby purchase price means only the amount paid by the applicant at the time of purchase of used cars. Therefore, refurbishment cost incurred on the old/used cars in order to make them more marketable would not form part of the ‘purchase price’ for the purpose of computing the margin of the supplier on supply of second-hand vehicle.
The appellant argued that if the view of Rajasthan AAR in this case is applied to the sales amount then the selling price would only be the amount charged for the sale of the old car which would exclude the amount charged from the customer for the refurbishment expenses. This would be against the valuation provisions under the GST law i.e. Section 15(1) of the CGST Act.
The AAAR affirmed the views of Rajasthan AAR and held refurbished cost is not allowed to be deducted. It was further held that the valuation provisions provided under Section 15(1) cannot apply where the supplier is paying GST under the margin scheme as the margin scheme specifically provides the manner of computing the value of supply.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied