Refund claim should not be rejected due to deficiency of GST network: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 26 December, 2022
Case Details: Aartos International LLP v. Deputy Commissioner (Customs) - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 558 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Ms Sonia Gokani & Mrs Mauna M. Bhatt, JJ.
- Hardik V. Vora for the Petitioner.
- Nikunt K. Raval for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner had exported goods and refund was granted to two out of three shipping bills filed but refund on account of one shipping bill was rejected. The department contended that third shipping bill was showing “Permanent Cancellation by PAO for transaction” as per ICEGATE Scroll status and refund was not paid by bank on account of mismatch in name of firm of petitioner. The petitioner filed petition seeking refund along with interest before the High Court.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that shipping bills are deemed as refund application when goods are exported with payment of tax and therefore, department should have sanctioned 90 percent of amount claimed in said bills. The Court also noted that the refund was not granted due to deficiency of GST network and it is duty of GSTN to enquire if there is any difficulty at level of mismatch or processing of claim of refund. Thus, the Court directed GSTN/concerned authority to introduce a feature in GST portal to communicate problems faced by assessee directly instead of officers pleading their seniors through GSTN. The Court also directed department to sanction refund with interest at rate of 6 percent.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied