Recovery Notice Held Invalid as Adjudication Proceedings Suffered from Material Irregularity and are Bad in Law | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 November, 2023
Case Details: Aditya Medisales Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 323 (Jharkhand)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Rongon Mukhopadhyay & Deepak Roshan, JJ.
- M.S. Mittal, Sr. Adv. & Salona Mittal, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- A.K. Yadav & Ranjan Kumar for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Recovery notice was issued against the petitioner in respect of the transitional credit claimed by him. It filed a writ petition against the same. The petitioner contended that the department issued a summary Order for demanding the transitional credit claimed by it and no detailed order was issued. Further, when the petitioner applied a detailed order sheet, the department only served a summary show cause notice in Form DRC-01 and no detailed notice was provided.
Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the Appellate Authority partially rejected the transitional claim. It further contended that the Appellate Tribunal has not yet been formed, hence, as per a circular, the time limit for filing the second appeal has not yet been commenced. The respondent authorities, thereafter, issued a recovery notice.
High Court Held
High Court noted that the show cause notice did not fulfill the ingredients of the SCN. Also, only a summary Order was issued in Form GST DRC-07. Further, the credit disallowed by the Appellate Authority is not contended by the respondent. Hence, the recovery notice is liable to be set aside. It further stated that even if the amount is found recoverable after the assessment is done, the same is recoverable under the GST laws, hence the interest of the revenue is also safeguarded.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied