Reassessment justified as huge cash was deposited against PAN of assessee being non-filer of ITR: HC
- News|Blog|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 April, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Farmacia Molio v. ITO - [2022] 137 taxmann.com 256 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- M.S. Sonak and R.N. Laddha, JJ.
- Gaurang Panandikar, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessing Officer issued notice for reopening assessment in case of assessee on the ground that a cash deposit of the huge amount of Rs. 4.39 crores was made in Goa Urban Co-operative Bank and the PAN number used to make such a huge deposit was that of the assessee firm.
Further, despite having prima facie made such a large cash deposit in a non-current account, the assessee chose not to file any income tax returns. The assessee challenged the impugned notice and order seeking to reopen the assessment.
High Court Held
The Bombay High Court held that the circumstance of discovery of huge cash deposits against the assessee’s PAN number and the circumstance that for this assessment year, the assessee chose not to file any return at all were sufficient as well as relevant to the formation of reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. Therefore, no case was made out to interfere with impugned notice and impugned order.
Case Review
-
- Mohanlal Champalal Jain v. ITO [2019] 102 taxmann.com 293 (Bom.) (para 11) distinguished.
List of Cases referred to
-
- Mohanlal Champalal Jain v. ITO [2019] 102 taxmann.com 293 (Bom.) (para 3)
- ITO v. Mohanlal Champalal Jain [2019] 111 taxmann.com 67/267 Taxman 391 (SC) (para 3)
- Asa John Devinathan v. Addl. CIT [1980] 126 ITR 270 (Mad.) (para 12)
- CIT v. Agarwalla Bros. [1991] 189 ITR 786 (Patna) (para 12)
- Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. CIT [1993] 69 Taxman 627/203 ITR 456 (SC) (para 12)
- Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. v. ITO [1991] 59 Taxman 17/191 ITR 662 (SC) (para 12)
- New Delhi Television Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 151/271 Taxman 1/424 ITR 607 (SC) (para 13).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
