Proprietary concern is entitled to file CIRP application as an operational creditor as contemplated u/s 2(f): NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 27 October, 2021

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Interim Moratorium Barred Continuation of Proceedings u/s 138 of NI Act Against Petitioner Due to IBC’s Overriding Effect | HC

Blog, News, FEMA & Banking

Borrower’s Right to Redeem Secured Asset Ends on Publication of Notice u/s 9(1) of SI Rules, Not After Sale Completion | SC

Latest from Taxmann

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Application of code Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Case Details: Fipola Retail (India) (P.) Ltd. v. M2N Interiors - [2021] 131 taxmann.com 234 (NCLAT - Chennai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • M. Venugopal, Judicial Member and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member
    • Rohan Rajasekaran and N.V. Prakash, Advs. for the Appellant. 
    • Manivannan J. and M. Govindaraju, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The NCLT admitted the application filed by the operational creditor under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the corporate debtor.
However, the Corporate debtor alleged that said an application would not be maintainable as the application had been filed in name of a proprietary concern and proprietary concern is not a ‘person’ for purpose of filing an application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

NCLAT Held

The Authority referred to section 2(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 which provides that provisions of Code shall apply to partnership firms and proprietorship firms

Since the same application was filed by proprietorship through its proprietor and in the instant case said section 9 application contained name of proprietorship firm as well as the name of its sole proprietor, which was maintainable and accordingly, appeal against the order passed by NCLT was to be dismissed.

Case Review

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied