Professional fees can’t be treated as salary payment just because it was paid to managing director of Co.: ITAT
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 May, 2022
Case Details: Jayaram Rangan v. ACIT - [2022] 138 taxmann.com 100 (Chennai-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- G. Manjunatha, Accountant Member & Anikesh Banerjee, Judicial Member
- A. Mahesh, CA for the Appellant.
- G. Johnson, Addl. CIT for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee-individual had filed his return of income by disclosing income from house property, income from a profession, and income from other sources. During the assessment proceeding, AO noticed that the assessee derives consultancy income and setting fees from two companies. Assessee treated said income as his professional income and claimed various expenses against it.
However, AO didn’t accept the assessee’s claim and assessed consultancy fees under the head ‘salary’ and disallowed various expenses claimed by the assessee. On appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the order of AO. Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that there was an agreement between the assessee and the company for rendering professional services. As per the agreement, the assessee shall be designated as Managing Director and he had been entrusted with work of day to day overall operations of the company.
There was no restriction under the law for appointing a consultant/professional as managing director of the company and entrusting the day-to-day affairs of the company. Therefore, merely for reason that the assessee had been designated as Managing Director, it cannot be said that the professional fees received by the assessee for rendering professional services can be treated as salary.
AO without appreciating facts simply assessed the income of the assessee under the head ‘salary’. Thus, the findings of the CIT(A) were to be set aside and AO was directed to assess the income of the assessee under the head ‘income from profession’.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
If a director wants to receive payments as professional fees instead of salary. Is it legally valid? Can company pay professional fee for taking care day to day affairs to the Director?