Principles of Natural Justice not Violated without Bonafide Intention to Produce Documents
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 12 April, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Debabrata Das v. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax and Central Excise - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 133 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Amrita Sinha, J.
- Jagriti Mishra, Subrata Pal, Unus Ali, Subham Gupta, Debayan Goswami & Ms Ananya Bhattacharya for the Petitioner.
- Ratan Banik, Shankar Sarkar & Bedashruti Bose for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was aggrieved by the Order-in-Original passed by the Additional Commissioner and it filed writ petition stating that the said order was passed without giving any reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
The department contended that the notice was issued following which reply was submitted after lapse of almost 10 months. It was also contended that multiple opportunities of personal hearing were granted but adjournment was sought on account of non-availability of relevant details and on account of COVID.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that on each and every occasion the petitioner replied to the notices and requested adjournment on account of non-availability of necessary details from his accountant. Thereafter, order-in-original was passed against which no appeal was preferred and after expiry of period to file appeal, the writ petition was filed seeking relief.
The Court observed that there was not any violation of principles of natural justice since adjournments were sought all along but the necessary documents were never produced before the authority either in person or via virtual mode. Thus, it was held that matter was not required to be remanded for reconsideration as conduct of assessee did not appear to be bona fide and there was no violation of principle of nature justice.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
