Press release clarifying last date for availing ITC for invoices of July, 2017 to March, 2018 is valid: SC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 December, 2021
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Union of India v. AAP & Company - [2021] 133 taxmann.com 168 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- A. M. Khanwilkar and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ.
- Aman Lekhi, ASG Ms. Praveena Gautam, Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Neela Kedar Gokhale, Ms. Preeti Rani, Advs. and M.K. Maroria, AOR for the Appellant.
- Dr. Avinash Poddar, Ashok Sikka, Arvind Kumar, Prahlad Narayan Singh, Ms. Vivek Mishra, Ms. Mansha Shukla, Sameer Singh, Advs. Devendra Singh and Ms. Neelam Singh, AOR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Honorable Gujarat High Court earlier held that para 3 of press release dated 18-10-2018, clarifying that last date for availing ITC relating to invoices issued during July 2017 to March 2018, as last date for filing return in Form GSTR-3B, was illegal and contrary to section 16(4) read with section 39(1) and rule 61 of the CGST Rules. The revenue has filed appeal before the Supreme Court against this decision.
Supreme Court Held
The Honorable Apex Court has referred its decision in case of Bharti Airtel Ltd. [2021] 131 taxmann.com 319 (SC) by a three-Judge Bench which disapproved the decision of Gujarat High Court. Since, the three-Judge Bench judgment expressly overruled the impugned judgment, in such a case, the argument of distinguishing the three-judge Bench judgment would not be available. Thus, the limitation mentioned in para 3 of Press release dated 18-10-2018, clarifying that last date for availing ITC for invoices issued from July, 2017 to March, 2018 shall be last date for filing return FORM GSTR-3B for month of September, 2018 would be valid.
Case Review
-
- AAP & Co v. Union of India [2019] 107 taxmann.com 125/75 GST 192 (Guj.) (paras 1, 6) affirmed
List of Cases Referred to
-
- AAP & Co, Chartered Accountant v. Union of India [2019] 107 taxmann.com 125/75 GST 192 (Guj.) (para 1)
- Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. [2021] 131 taxmann.com 319 (SC) (para 2)
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
