Petitioner Shall be Deemed to Be Owner of Goods If Tax Invoice & E-way Bill Were Belonging to it | HC

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 14 December, 2023

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Company Law

No Pro-Rata Rights for Defaulting AIF Investors | SEBI

Blog, News, Company Law

SEBI Mandates Non-Individual Research Analysts to Ensure Client-Level Segregation for Research & Distribution Services

Latest from Taxmann

GST E-way Bill

Case Details: Halder Enterprises v. State of U.P. - [2023] 157 taxmann.com 231 (Allahabad)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Siddhartha Varma & Shekhar B. Saraf, JJ.
    • Aditya Pandey, Adv. for the Petitioner.
    • Ankur Agarwal, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner received an order for supply of goods and the goods were loaded on the vehicle and sent along with invoice and E-way bill. The vehicle was intercepted and during physical verification it was found that there was no discrepancy in relation to the consignment and the goods were as per the invoice and E-way bill. However, goods were detained on the ground that both the consignor and consignee were declared as non-existent.

After detention, the petitioner being the owner of the goods came forward and sought for release of the goods under section 129(1)(a) of the CGST Act. However, the authorities determined the penalty to be paid as per Section 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act. It filed writ petition against it.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that on the date of interception the petitioner was having a registration under the CGST Act but the said registration was subsequently suspended by the authorities at West Bengal. However, the goods were found with proper tax invoice and E-way bill belonging to petitioner. Therefore, in such a case, Circular No. 76/50/2018-GST dated 31-12-2018 would apply and petitioner would be deemed to be owner of goods. Thus, the Court held that the goods would have to be released in terms of section 129(1)(a) of CGST Act, 2017.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied