Petitioner aggrieved by notices issued by bank u/s 13(2) and 13(4) can appeal against such notices u/s 17 before DRT
- Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 22 September, 2021
Case details: Shyam Radios Railway Bazar Haldwani v. Punjab National Bank - [2021] 130 taxmann.com 220 (Uttarakhand)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Raghavendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. and Alok Kumar Verma, J.
- Xitij Kaushik, Ld. Counsel CJ for the Appellant.
- Siddhartha Jain, Ld. Counsel and J.C. Pandey, Ld. Brief Holder for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Petitioner-company obtained a loan from a bank and pledged the relevant properties as collateral. Following that, the petitioner defaulted on repayment. As a result, the petitioner asked the bank to work with them and allow them to repay the debt in manageable instalments.
The Bank, on the other hand, had refused such a proposal and instead issued notices to the petitioner under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
High Court Held
The petitioner, who was dissatisfied with the notices, filed a writ petition contesting them, and the High Court of Uttarakhand remarked that the petitioner had an effective alternative remedy in appealing the notices before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. As a result, the Single Judge was right in dismissing the petitioner’s writ petition.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied