Petition could not seek implementation of ‘One Time Settlement Scheme’ on failing to pay 5% upfront amount: HC

  • Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 23 July, 2021

One Time Settlement Scheme

Case Details: Rishika Cottons (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India - [2021] 128 taxmann.com 96 (Telangana)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • A. Rajasheker Reddy and Dr. Shameem Akther, JJ.

Facts of the Case

The Respondent bank offered a One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme to the petitioner, where under petitioner was required to pay 5 percent upfront amount on or before 23-11-2020, for processing OTS proposal of the petitioner.

However, the respondent bank closed the OTS scheme as the petitioner failed to pay the upfront amount within time. On being aggrieved, the Petitioner disputed the same and sought for a direction by way of the writ petition to implement the OTS scheme in the Court of Law.

High Court Held

The HC submitted that the OTS scheme is non-discretionary and non-discriminatory and once the petitioner fails to adhere to the time stipulated, it would not be entitled to benefit under the scheme. Thus, the petitioner had not even paid 5 percent upfront amount within time stipulated in OTS, it would not be entitled to seek for implementation of the said scheme, and the writ petition was to be dismissed.

Cases Review

    • K. Saraswathy v. P.S.S. Somasundaram Chettiar [1989] 4 SCC 527 (para 29) distinguished
    • Sardar Associates v. Punjab and Sind Bank [2011] 3 taxmann.com 42 (SC) (para 30) distinguished

List of Cases Referred to

    • Prince Corrugated Packaging v. Andhra Bank [Writ Petition No. 5685 of 2019, dated 26-9-2019] (para 4)
    • K. Saraswathy v. P.S.S. Somasundaram Chettiar [1989] 4 SCC 527 (para 9)
    • Sardar Associates v. Punjab & Sind Bank [2011] 3 taxmann.com 42 (SC) (para 10)
    • M. Appa Rao v. Dy. General Manager – Cum-Authorized Officer [W.P. No. 20464 of 2017, dated 15-2-2018] (para 26)
    • Swetha Exports v. Bank of India [2017] 86 taxmann.com 171/144 SCL 373 (Telangana) (para 27)

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied