Pendency of case before Addl. CMM can’t be a reason to transfer of assessee’s case to another State: HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 25 January, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Divesh Prakashchand Jain v. PCIT - [2022] 134 taxmann.com 93 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- K.R. Shriram and Amit B. Borkar, JJ.
- Devendra H. Jain for the Petitioner.
- Suresh Kumar and M.J. Babu for the Respond
Facts of the Case
The assessee was a partner in a firm-S. S. Jewellery was engaged in the manufacture and sale of gold ornaments. It has a principal place of business in Mumbai, and the firm had a branch in Bengaluru.
During the course of its business, the firm sent samples, jewellery, etc., to Bengaluru to be displayed to potential customers. On 20-11-2020, 2 employees of the assessee’s firm were intercepted by the Bengaluru Police, and 6055.23 grams of gold jewellery belonging to the firm was found.
Investigations commenced, and a case before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Addl. CMM) was pending. The DDIT (Investigation), Bengaluru, was a Respondent in that case before the learned Addl. CMM.
A notice was issued to the assessee to show cause as to why his case should not be transferred to Bengaluru for completing the assessment proceedings. The assessee filed the reply, but his objections were rejected, and the transferred order was passed. Assessee filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court.
High Court Held
The Bombay High Court held that there was no doubt that the assessee was served a show-cause notice, and the personal hearing was also granted before passing the order. However, the reasons recorded in the order are certainly subject to judicial scrutiny and must be reasonable.
However, the revenue had only narrated the facts without giving reasons as to why the assessee’s case was transferred to Bengaluru, considering the facts and circumstances of the case. Assessee is assessed in Mumbai, and the firm of which assessee is a partner is also assessed in Mumbai. Mere because a case was pending before the Addl. CMM cannot be accepted as a reason for the transfer of assessee’s from Mumbai to Bengaluru.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
