Parallel Proceedings by SGST Dept. on Different Subject Matter of Different Period Were Not Invalid | Bombay HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 November, 2023
Case Details: Yash Alloys India v. Union of India - [2023] 155 taxmann.com 594 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- G.S. Kulkarni & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
- Kevic Setalvad, Sr. Adv. & Jehan Lalkaka for the Petitioner.
-
Jitendra B. Mishra, Styaprakash Sharma & Jyoti Chavan, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, proceedings under Central GST Act were initiated against petitioner in respect of fraudulent ITC relating to period from 1-7-2017 to 31-3-2021. Thereafter, another proceedings were initiated by State GST Department under Maharashtra GST Act. It filed writ petition to challenge the proceedings under State GST Act and prayed for stay the investigation since proceedings already going on.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that as per Section 6(2)(b) of Maharashtra GST Act, where a proper officer under CGST Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by proper officer under MGST Act on same subject matter.
However, in the present case, the proceedings under MGST Act were in respect of period from 1-4-2021 to 4-10-2023 and scope of investigation was in respect of illegal refunds. Therefore, the Court held that the provisions of Section 6(2)(b) of the MGST Act, in any manner, wouldn’t be attracted in the facts of the present case to bar MGST proceedings.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied