Order rejecting refund claim on grounds not mentioned in SCN is not sustainable: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 September, 2022
Case Details: Varidhi Cotspin (P.) Ltd. v. State of Gujarat - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 498 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- N.V. Anjaria & Bhargav D. Karia, JJ.
- Hardik P. Modh for the Petitioner.
- Trupesh Kathiriya for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner filed application for refund of IGST paid on import of goods under Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG). The department issued SCN while proposing not to entertain the prayer for refund and reasons mentioned in SCN were as follows:
1. As per SGST Act-Section 54(1) refund period is more than two years, so refund application is liable to reject.
2. There is no clear ground on which refund application is filed.
3. On which ground refund amount is calculated is not clear.
4. Attached documents are incomplete.
The petitioner submitted reply of SCN and thereafter the order was passed rejecting the refund by stating that refund was inadmissible because of wrong ITC claim. The petitioner field writ petition to quash order rejecting refund claim.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that the department rejected claim of refund on the basis of ground which was never mentioned in the SCN. In the instant case, the opportunity to meet with ground mentioned in SCN had not been given to petitioner. Therefore, the impugned order was to be set aside and the department was directed to consider refund claim afresh and pass order.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied