Order Passed Without Hearing & Order-in-appeal Passed Without Considering Condonation Application are not Sustainable | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 November, 2023
Case Details: Ramji Kirana Store v. State of U.P. - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 600 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Pankaj Bhatia, J.
- Amit Kumar Singh for the Petitioner.
- C.S.C. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee received a notice where in the columns next to date of personal hearing, time of personal hearing and venue of personal hearing, the word “NA” was transcribed. The department passed order without granting any hearing.
The assessee challenged order by filing an appeal, although with a delay along with condonation request but the same was not considered. It filed writ petition against the order and rejection of appeal.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the assessment order was passed without providing any hearing to the assessee. Also, the impugned order by Appellate Authority revealed non-application of mind as condonation request was not considered before rejecting appeal of assessee.
Therefore, the Court held that the original orders suffered from vice of not following mandatory provisions as contained in Section 75(4) of CGST Act, 2017 and passed in violation of principles of natural justice and thus liable to be set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied