Order of provisional attachment not sustainable if passed without recording opinion & referring to tangible material: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 22 October, 2022
Case Details: Varun Gupta v. Union of India - [2022] 143 taxmann.com 396 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Surya Prakash Kesarwani & Jayant Banerji, JJ.
- Alok Saxena for the Petitioner.
- A.S.G.I. & Sudarshan Singh for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner has earlier filed writ petition filed for quashing provisional attachment as proceedings were not pending. The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the order of provisional attachment. However, the second order on provisional attachment was passed immediately by Commissioner. The petitioner again filed writ petition to quash such second order directing provisional attachment of bank account.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that no proceedings under section 74 of CGST Act had been initiated. The Commissioner had passed impugned order without recording his opinion and referring to tangible material which necessitated him to pass order so as to protect interest of revenue. The impugned order failed to fulfil ingredients of section 83 and the same had been passed in arbitrary and illegal manner and also against the Supreme Court decision in case of Radha Krishan Industries [2021] 127 taxmann.com 26 (SC). Therefore, the impugned order was not sustainable and liable to be quashed. Also, the Court held that the costs of Rs. 50,000 to be imposed on department and shall be paid to petitioner.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied