Order based on discrepancies different from those mentioned in scrutiny notice is not sustainable: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 14 November, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Vadivel Pyrotech (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Circle-II - [2022] 144 taxmann.com 179 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Mohammed Shaffiq, J.
- N. Viswanathan for the Petitioner.
- M. Prakash for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of pyrotechnic products (fireworks). The department undertaken scrutiny of the GST returns and issued scrutiny notice under Section 61 in Form ASMT-10 pointing out certain discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. It submitted reply and after 6 months, an order was passed demanding tax, interest & penalty on basis of defects which were different from the defects/discrepancy which were earlier pointed out in the Form ASMT-10. It filed writ petition to quash summary of show cause notice and consequential orders as same had not been issued in accordance with scrutiny notice.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that as per GST provisions, the proper officer may scrutinize returns and in case any discrepancies are noticed, the same shall be informed in ASMT-10 seeking explanation from the taxable person. In case the explanation is not satisfactory or no explanation is offered then the proper officer shall proceed to pass order in GST DRC-07. However, in the present case, ASMT-10 was issued for certain discrepancies but DRC-01 and consequential order had been issued/ passed for different discrepancies. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside and matter was remanded to assessing officer for re-assessment.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
