Opportunity of personal hearing is mandatory before passing adverse order with liability: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 23 March, 2023
Case Details: Mohan Agencies v. State of U.P. - [2023] 148 taxmann.com 323 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Pritinker Diwaker, ACJ. & Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.
- Vishwjit for the Petitioner.
- C.S.C. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner received a notice seeking his reply within 30 days. It submitted reply and an adverse order was passed. In the impugned order demand in excess to Rs. 10 crores was raised against the petitioner. It filed writ petition to challenge the adjudication order on the ground that the opportunity of hearing was not granted.
The Revenue contended that the petitioner was denied opportunity of hearing because it had tick marked the option ‘No’ against the option for personal hearing.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that this Court has already laid down by way of principle of law that assessee is not required to request for opportunity of personal hearing and it is mandatory for the authority to afford such opportunity before passing an adverse order. The Court also noted that marking of “NA” would be of no legal consequence and minimal opportunity of hearing shall be necessary as this opportunity would ensure observation of natural justice.
In the instant case, the order created huge liability and such opportunity would have ensured that authority shall pass appropriate order and allow better appreciation at appellate stage. Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was to be set aside and matter was remitted to Adjudicating Authority to issue fresh notice.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied