[Opinion] Tax Exemption for Tea Warehousing – A High Court Victory for Agriculture
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 15 December, 2023
Yubaraj Chatterjee – [2023] 157 taxmann.com 280 (Article)
Introduction
In a landmark decision of Nutan Warehousing Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner Writ Petition No. 12775 Of 2019, the Bombay High Court has declared “tea” stored in warehouses to be an agricultural produce, exempting it from GST under Notification No. 12/ 2017-Central Tax (Rate). This ruling in favor of Nutan Warehousing Company Pvt. Ltd., has significant implications for the taxation of tea storage and processing activities.
Previously, the Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) had denied the exemption, arguing that the stored tea underwent further processing, such as blending, altering its agricultural character. However, the High Court found this reasoning flawed, highlighting that minor processing and packing don’t negate the essential nature of tea as an agricultural product.
This decision clarifies the tax treatment of tea storage and paves the way for potential tax savings for warehouse owners and related businesses. It also underscores the importance of legal principles and precedent in tax rulings, emphasizing the need for careful consideration before denying exemptions.
Facts
Nutan Warehousing, a company that leased its warehouse to M/s. Unilever, found itself embroiled in a tax dispute regarding tea storage. Unilever stored bulk tea in Nutan’s warehouse, undergoing standard processing like procurement and blending for potential export. Nutan claimed this activity qualified for exemption from GST under a notification classifying “agricultural produce” storage as tax-free. The Commissioner argued the processing transformed the tea into a manufactured product, disqualifying it from the exemption. The Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) agreed with the Commissioner, denying the exemption. Nutan, however, challenged this decision in the Bombay High Court, claiming the AAAR made an error of law by misapplying legal principles and overlooking the tea’s essential character as an agricultural product, even after processing.
Click Here To Read The Full Article
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied