Notice Delivery Flaw Doesn’t Invalidate Appointment of Arbitrator Order When Applicant Knew of Previous Sittings | HC
- Blog|News|Company Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 September, 2023
Case Details: Swiss Singapore India (P.) Ltd. v. Belseri Tea Co. (India) (P.) Ltd. - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 193 (HC-Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
- Reetobroto Mitra & Ms Debolina Dey, Advs. for the Applicant.
- Rajiv Lall, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the Applicant Company and respondent entered into a share purchase agreement. Later, an arbitration clause was invoked between the parties and an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by the respondent.
An order was passed and proceedings under section 11 were disposed of by appointing an arbitrator to resolve the dispute between parties. It was recorded in the said order that in spite of the service of notice, the applicant had not entered an appearance.
The applicant filed an instant application to recall the said order submitting that notice of application under section 11 was served at the wrong addresses as the respondent failed to undertake a reasonable inquiry, which would have revealed a change of address of the applicant’s company.
It was found that there was no occasion for the respondent to make such enquiry, having no reason to apprehend such alteration of the address of the applicant company and Arbitrator held several sittings of which the applicant was well aware.
High Court Held
The High Court held that in the absence of any palpable error apparent on the face of said order, there was no occasion to recall the same and the order appointing an arbitrator was to be affirmed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied