No writ can be filed against assessment order which was pending for consideration before Appellate Authority: HC

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 24 December, 2021

Income-tax Act 1961 - Commissioner (Appeals) - Powers of (Writ remedy) - Pursuant to notice for re-assessment;

Case Details: Agrawal Global Infratech (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India - [2021] 133 taxmann.com 137 (Chhattisgarh)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Parth Prateem Sahu, J.
    • Apurv Goyal, Adv. for the Petitioner. 
    • Ajay Kumrani and Ms. Naushina Ali, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Assessee filed the writ petition before the Chhattisgarh High Court challenging the assessment order and demand notice issued under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Revenue challenged the maintainability of the writ petition as the assessee had already approached the Appellate Authority invoking provisions under section 246(A) of the Act of 1961. The assessee filed a statutory appeal, and thus it could not be permitted to file a writ petition during the pendency of the said statutory appeal. Two parallel proceedings challenging the same order and proceedings is not permissible under the law.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the assessee’s grievance was Assessing Officer overlooked its prayer to provide a personal hearing and passed the impugned assessment order. It was argued that if the assessment is not made in accordance with the procedure laid down under section 144(B) then the same shall be non est in the eyes of law.
It was not in dispute that the Appellate Authority has powers to set aside the assessment order if it is contrary to mandatory provisions under the Act. Under section 251 of the Act of 1961, the Appellate Authority has all the powers to consider the grounds raised by the assessee in appeal.
Thus, the writ petition challenging the same order which was pending consideration before the Appellate Authority, was not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed.

List of Cases Referred to

    • Satya Pal Anand v. State of M.P. [2016] 10 SCC 767 (para 6).

Income Tax Returns 2021-22

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied