No tax demand can be issued or raised when investigation is still in progress: Telangana HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 16 August, 2021
Case details: Deem Distributors (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 134 (TELANGANA)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- M.S. Ramachandra Rao and T. Vinod Kumar, JJ.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a partnership firm and involved in the business of dealing in goods and services relating to Ferrous waste and scrap, re-melting scrap ingots of iron or steel etc. The department issued a letter to the petitioner saying that the petitioner had availed input tax credit on the basis of invoices issued by certain suppliers/firms which were fictitious and were issuing fake invoices with an intent to pass on input tax credit, and the petitioner was requested to reverse the input tax credit of Rs. 1,52,35,820/- availed on such invoices immediately. If it would not be reversed then a show cause would be issued under sub-Section (1) of Section 74 of CGST Act. It filed writ petition against the same.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that a notice in sub-Section (1) of Section 74 of CGST Act may be issued by the proper officer if he is of the opinion that the input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilized by reason of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts, to the person who has wrongly availed or utilized input tax credit. But without determination of liability against the petitioner in any enquiry conducted under the Act, a demand for reversal of input tax credit or payment of tax with interest for penalty can’t be raised. Moreover, no advisory jurisdiction is conferred on the officer of GST department to issue any ‘advises’ of the nature issued to the petitioner to reverse credit. Therefore, it was held that no tax demand can be issued or raised when investigation is still in progress.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied