No Section 40A(2) Disallowance Without Examining Qualification, Experience, and Work Profile of Related Parties | HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 October, 2023
Case Details: Mehra Jewel Palace (P.) Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax - [2023] 155 taxmann.com 270 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Girish Kathpalia & Rajiv Shakdher, JJ.
- Salil Aggarwal, Sr. Adv., Madhur Aggarwal & Uma Shankar, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Sunil Agarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel, Shivansh Pandya, Standing Counsel & Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
During the year under consideration, the assessee paid salaries to its relatives specified under Section 40A(2). Meanwhile, in the assessment proceedings, the AO called upon the assessee to justify the payments made to specified persons. Unsatisfied with the explanation, AO made additions to the income of the assessee.
The matter reached the Delhi High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the assessee tried to justify the payment of salaries to the persons concerned. No evidence at all was adduced before any of the authorities by the assessee regarding the educational qualification, experience, and work profile of any of the persons concerned, which could be taken as their contribution to the growth of the business of the assessee.
The provision under Section 40A(2)(a) of the Act clearly shows that before recording disallowance, AO has to form an opinion regarding the legitimate needs of the business or benefit derived or even what would be the fair payment outgo for services rendered. Such an opinion cannot be arrived at without adducing necessary evidence. Thus, AO was duty-bound to provide an opportunity for the assessee to place on record the requisite evidence to justify its claim.
But all that the AO did was to ask the assessee to justify the salaries paid and, without seeking relevant evidence, simply rejected the claim.
Therefore, the assessee must be granted an opportunity to adduce appropriate evidence, documentary or otherwise, before the AO to establish its claim regarding educational qualification, experience, work profile, and, in particular, the duties discharged by the concerned persons to justify the claim of the assessee with respect to payment of salary to the persons concerned.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied