No Bench Can Hear a Case Unless Assigned Per Roster or Specially Assigned to Bench by Chief Justice | SC
- Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 16 February, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Directorate of Enforcement v. Bablu Sonkar - [2024] 159 taxmann.com 354 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Abhay S. Oka & Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the Respondent filed a writ petition for quashing a complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. In the said writ, there was no interim relief granted pending the hearing of the petition.
A roster Bench finally heard the writ petition and reserved judgment. Later on, a writ petition filed by the respondent was listed for further hearing. The Bench recorded that there were similar matters involving the same issue and its judgment would impact other cases which were pending.
Consequently, the bench directed that judgment was to be de-reserved and the petition to be heard afresh along with other connected matters and decided together in accordance with the law. Meanwhile, the bench directed that the petitioner be released on bail.
It was noted that even though there was no prayer made by the respondent for the grant of bail, the Bench granted bail for releasing the Respondent. Even if such a prayer had been made, the Bench could not have heard prayer for bail. Only the roster Bench could have heard the same as these were all matters of propriety.
The roster notified by the Chief Justice was not an empty formality. All the Judges were bound by the same.
Supreme Court Held
The Supreme Court held that the part of the impugned order granting bail was to be set aside. Further, the respondent was permitted to move the roster bench by filing an application for interim relief/grant of bail and such application would be entertained by the High Court, only after the respondent surrenders.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
